Here is the comment I tried to post on Ming's weblog, in reply to your comment. For some reason my text submission was truncated. I mailed a copy of my comment to Natalie, in case this post fails as well.
Thank you "lugon"! ... for the opportunity to show how much "I dare" saying what I'd like to see happening ...
The Bloggers Parliament initiative starts off very well .. but:
1) I'm still doubtful about the fact that "solutions" are presented as something which can be found sort of "ready made"
2) I think point 7 of Natalie's Guidelines offers a more realistic case, in http://www.nataliedarbeloff.com/bloggersparliament.html, where it includes the possibility for an idea to be presented as a would-be-solution
3) problems can be specified and classified ,,, by all means .. and that would help greatly in focussing (or scoping) a proposed solution
4) yes ... I think the emphasis should be on "proposing" solutions ... rather than on "finding" them
5) I see a "proposed solution" as a magic kick-off opportunity for sharing a motivation ... i.e.: a motivation for people who don't know each other ... who may speak different languages ... and belong to different cultures ... to get together and start "creating" a solution .. or I might even say ... "becoming" a solution ...
6) I strongly feel the "digital divide" is the most challenging problem .. I'd like to see listed by the BP .. it's a technology related problem which badly needs a "social" solution ..
Am I daring too much ???
All the best from zigzag (alias Luigi)
PS - I'm considering the possibility to contribute an Italian translation of the BP pages ..
|